Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00272
Original file (PD2013 00272.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD1300272
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20131024
SEPARATION DATE: 20090625


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (68W20/Medic) medically separated for a right knee condition. In December of 2005, the CI had a trailer fall on his right leg injuring his right knee. The right knee condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded chronic right knee pain status post (s/p) right knee arthroscopy with microfracture of the right medial femoral condyle, and s/p right HemiCap to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The PEB adjudicated the condition as right knee pain rated from arthritis, due to trauma while in Iraq; soldier had undergone a right knee arthroscopic medial meniscal repair and microfracture of the medial femoral condyle, and a right knee HemiCap procedure, as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Prothetic [sic] Implant.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right knee condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20090416
 VA - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Knee Pain Rated From Arthritis
 5010 10% Status Postoperative Medial Meniscus Tear with Medial Femoral Condyle and Avascular Necrosis, RT Knee 5262 20% STR
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 STR
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 90304 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).

invalid font number 31506

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Knee Pain Condition. The CI had an injury in August 2005 when a 5-ton trailer landed onto his right knee and ankle. He had arthroscopic surgery on 14 February 2006 and was medevac’d from Kuwait for physical therapy on 24 June 2006. He was subsequently scheduled for surgery at Walter Reed. The CI underwent a procedure on 27 May 2008 commonly referred to as a partial knee replacement. On 9 September 2008, right knee X-rays revealed stable post-surgical changes of tunneling of the right medial tibial plateau and orthopedic hardware in the right medial femoral condyle. On 5 January 2009, he was profiled with a permanent lower extremity level 3 profile for right knee pain, s/p prosthetic implant surgery. This prevented the CI from moving with a fighting load for at least 2 miles and an rendered him unable to construct an individual fighting position or do 3-5 second rushes under direct and indirect fire, which prevented deployments. The commander’s statement indicated the CI was physically challenged to accomplish duties requiring lifting or carrying of heavy loads, and unable to perform medical evacuation operations requiring any lifting. Additionally, the commander indicated his medical condition negatively impacted advancement and continued service especially in a tactical environment, in combat or in an emergency environment. The NARSUM noted the CI reported pain at rest of 2 out of 10 in intensity. Dull, achy pain was localized primarily to the medial joint line of the right knee and daily swelling. The pain increased to 6-7 out of 10 with activities such as standing for more than 30 minutes, walking on uneven ground, running, jumping or walking up stairs. The pain was somewhat relieved with rest and ice. Physical examination revealed normal muscle strength, normal reflexes, no swelling of the right knee, a 10 cm vertical incision on the right medial joint line and negative anterior and posterior drawer signs. There were no VA Compensation and Pension examinations in the record.
The VA used the service treatment record in awarding its rating determination.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Board considered VASRD diagnostic code 5010 (arthritis, due to trauma, substantiated by X-ray findings: rate as arthritis, degenerative) used by the PEB for a 10% rating. The Board could not find evidence of a compensable ROM defect under codes 5256 (knee, ankylosis of), 5261 (e.g., limitation of extension of) or 5262 (tibia and fibula, impairment of), for a higher rating using this code or alternate knee codes. The Board considered code 5262 (tibia and fibula, impairment of) used by the VA for a 20% rating. The Board could not find evidence in the record to describe the disability as marked impairment of the knee or ankle for a higher adjudication. The Board considered code 5055 (knee replacement [prosthesis]) and found that the 100% temporary disability rating for 12 months did not benefit the CI because the surgery was performed 13 months prior to separation. A lengthy discussion ensued with respect to applicability of code 5055 and a minimum rating in this case. A majority of the Board believed that the CI’s condition at separation did not approximate criteria supporting a 30% rating for his right knee. The Board considered previous cases regarding partial and full knee replacement ratings heard at the VA Board of Appeals, and agreed that code 5055 does not differentiate between a partial and full knee replacement. However, the majority also believed that application of the minimum rating in this case required evidence to support residual rating(s) under codes 5256, 5261 and/or 5262; and, that such evidence was not apparent in this case and thus provided no avenue for a higher postoperative permanent rating recommendation. As stated above, the single vote of dissent on the case noted that VASRD code 5055 did not differentiate between a partial or a total knee replacement, and assigns a minimal disability rating of 30%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right knee condition.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right knee pain condition, and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board recommends no change in the PEB adjudication by a vote of 2:1. The single voter for dissent (who recommended code 5055 at 30%) did not elect to submit a minority opinion.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Right Knee Pain Condition
 5010 10%
COMBINED
 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130508, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB                                                       

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20140006428 (PD201300272)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01734

    Original file (PD-2012-01734.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20021130 “Chronic knee pain” and “Grade IV chondromalacia of patella, right knee,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00123

    Original file (PD2011-00123.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “left knee pain with grade II chondromalacia” condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and possible application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency pain policy and DoDI 1332.39. Left Knee Condition . MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00094

    Original file (PD2009-00094.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    If used, it would most likely be at the "Moderate" knee disability 20% level considering the totality of CI's knee exam and post-separation VA exam which demonstrated no worsening of CI's knee condition. In the matter of the Right Knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends separately coding the instability and painful motion of the CI's right knee with a rating of Chronic right knee instability s/p trauma, 5010-5257 at 20% and Right knee pain limited motion s/p trauma, 5010-5260 at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01521

    Original file (PD 2012 01521.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A final PEB revised for an administrative correction dated 18 March 2003 adjudicated the chronic pain, left knee condition as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USPDA) pain policy. By rating decision 15 March 2004, the VA rated the condition 30% based on the partial knee replacement surgery after separation (coded 5055). RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01021

    Original file (PD2012-01021.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the right knee osteochondral defect, medial femoral condyle condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). At the MEB exam the CI reported that he did not have power in his knee and the pain limited his capabilities. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: VASRD CODE...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00278

    Original file (PD2013 00278.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The chronic right knee pain/right knee arthritis was the only condition forwarded by the MEB to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501 in December 2004. ** VA Exam was ~ 13 mos after Release From Active Duty; ~ 14 mos before final Date of Separation from reserve status ANALYSIS SUMMARY : Chronic Right Knee Pain Condition . RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01692

    Original file (PD-2014-01692.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “traumatic osteoarthritis left knee, with OCD lesions, lateral femoral condyle and tibial plateau, s/p ACL reconstruction and microfracture of left femoral condyle”as a single unfitting condition, rated 10%,with likely application of theVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appealsand was medically separated. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends there be no re-characterization of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01599

    Original file (PD2012 01599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Knee Condition . Therefore the Board conclude there not sufficient evidence for consideration of a rating under diagnostic code 5257 (other impairment, instability). SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130018487 (PD201201599)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01525

    Original file (PD2012 01525.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Knee . The Board noted that there was no pain on ROM testing on either the MEB or C&P examinations; however, both examinations made reference to tenderness about the patella and noted pain with activity implying painful motion. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.As...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01065

    Original file (PD 2013 01065.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20040505VA - (~ 4.5 Mos Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain5099-500310%Degenerative Joint Disease Left Knee501010%20040415Degenerative Joint Disease Right Knee501010%20040415Residual Scarring Left Knee Surgeries780410%20040415No Additional MEB/PEB EntriesOther x 520040415 Combined: 10%Combined: 80% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20040910 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS))...